Smith Commission Proposes New Powers for Scotland

The Smith Commission has produced its long-awaited report on new powers for the Scottish Parliament. For the most part, it’s a fairly wonkish document that focuses on things like income tax and Air Passenger Duty, but there are some constitutional points of interest.

As expected, the Commission wants to entrench Scottish devolution in UK law. It’s not clear how this will work, however, since the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty means that no Parliament can bind its successor. Therefore, a future Parliament could abolish the Scottish devolution settlement at any time. That being said, the act of entrenchment would still have considerable moral force, so the precise legalities of the situation might not matter.

The Smith Commission also wants to place the Sewel Convention on a statutory footing. Although the Westminster Parliament still possesses unfettered legislative authority over Scotland, the Sewel Convention dictates that it will not exercise this power without the consent of the Scottish Parliament. But this is ultimately just a gentlemen’s agreement, so it seems wise to make it official.

The Scottish Parliament could also end up regulating Scottish elections. Many of these powers are fairly esoteric, though they would allow the Scottish Parliament to give 16 or 17 year olds the vote, which is something the SNP has wanted to do for some time (a cynic might argue that this is because young people are generally more willing to support the SNP!). Interestingly, the Smith Commission proposes that changes to electoral law should require a 2/3 majority for passage. This is something of a novelty (there is no such requirement at Westminster), but it seems like a prudent step since it could prevent the sort of partisan gerrymandering that plagues US politics.

In the end, the Smith Commission’s report feels a bit like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. It’s not going to mollify voters who supported independence (Nicola Sturgeon has already pointed out that, even with the Smith Commission’s changes, the Scottish Parliament will still be responsible for less than half the money it spends), and it doesn’t address the UK’s wider constitutional quandary. It creates the illusion of progress while ultimately not accomplishing much. Instead of tinkering with details, Britain should take the time to hash out a definitive constitutional settlement that can stand the test of time.

This entry was posted in Devolution and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Smith Commission Proposes New Powers for Scotland

  1. Laurence Cox says:

    A definitive constitutional settlement would need much more consideration than the Smith Commission has given, because its remit was only to agree powers to be devolved to Holyrood. No doubt, then the SNP would have complained about them taking too long to agree. I find it rather hypocritical that Sturgeon is complaining about the settlement, when the SNP were one of the parties that agreed to it.

    • jasonloch says:

      I don’t fault the Smith Commission itself. It had a very specific job to do, and it did it well. I just wish the politicians would take a step back and look at the big picture instead of focusing on the details. I realize that, because of their hasty promises to the Scottish people, the Westminster parties are under a great deal of pressure to act quickly, but that can’t be allowed to obscure the need for a wider program of reform. Like Rome, a new constitution won’t be built in a day, and it would behoove the Government to start the ball rolling sooner rather than later.

Comments are closed.